Don’t Sue. Teach Better.
A German teacher sued an Internet site where students can rate their teachers, on the grounds that her career had been hurt, and lost.
It’s been less than two years since I graduated from college, and the memories of bad and good teachers are still fresh in my mind. I am thankful to say that the University of Washington provided me with a number of great teachers (many of whom, however, were actually graduate students), but I must admit that some of my instructors were self-serving and truly horrible teachers. I feel that Internet sites that allow students to “rate” their teachers is a very positive thing, and is long overdue.
If you go to the local mechanic and receive poor service, you can go on Yelp and give that mechanic a poor rating. This will save many other people the inconvenience of receiving poor service, and gives mechanics an added impetus to do good work. We pay to go to college. Even though they often act like it, instructors are not little gods-on-campus that can, once they receive tenure, do whatever they want without repercussions. Teachers must be held accountable for their teaching, and since the schools don’t do it, students must.
In a way, universities are like professional sports teams, and professors are like professional athletes. Universities scout out other schools for the best “talent”–usually a teacher who has published a popular book—and scoop them up. Unlike professional athletes, however, professors are not fired if they cease in their ability to perform. An instructor can be granted tenure, which protects a teacher from being fired, after the teacher has taught at that school for a little while. While many instructors do not abuse their tenure, others do, and I have witnessed this first-hand.
After all the money students pay to go to college, often placing them in debt for years to come (I am still paying off my student loans, two years later), students deserve quality teaching. Just because a professor has a PhD, wrote a good book or has great connections, does not mean that the professor is a good teacher. I can’t count the number of times I had to sit in the very front of the class because the teacher spoke too softly, had to stand the whole class because the class was overbooked, had to hire a tutor because the instructor was confusing, or went days without sleep because the instructor had unrealistic expectations and assigned too much work. I seriously got more out of reading my textbooks, in almost every class I ever took with a few exceptions, than I did from my instructors. Universities have become more of a racket than a place of learning, in my opinion.
And so I embrace anything that holds teachers accountable. If you are in college, enthusiastically participate in sites like RateMyTeachers and RateMyProfessors. Will there be abuses? Yes, just like there are on Yelp and anywhere else where any person has unmoderated access to a service. But the more people use it, the more reliable it gets, just like a 5-star product with 50 reviews on Amazon.com is more reliable than one with one review. Teachers, instead of suing to keep your students from rating your performance poorly, maybe, just maybe, teach better.
I am often amazed at the degree of professionalism of some people and how they teach. My niece is a teacher, and frankly – even though I love her – she isn’t the teaching type.
First, she has no voice – at all, zip. A mouse speaks louder than her when she is yelling.
Two, she teaches Spanish, yet doesn’t understand proper English. How can you teach Spanish, when you don’t understand your own?
I own a Real Estate Salesperson license in the state of Massachusetts. Every two years, I have to go back and get a “refresher” course. Teachers affected multiple minds. Shouldn’t they be held to at least the same standards?
Great article. I think so to especially cause the teach in question is my old religion teacher and i undestand why she got such a bad rating on this site.
I was fortunate enough to helpful Instructors when working towards my Drafting Degree.
I do believe Teachers of all levels should be required to do refresher seminars to continue teaching. I’m a martial arts instructor. In order to continue instructing, I must continue my training. Same should apply to all.
Primary education teachers, i.e. those not teaching college, have a license. That license expires every 5 years. They must be recertified to receive their license again.
Ian, that is not always true.
There are many states where it is simply sending in money to renew your license. Other states “grandfather” you in if you got your license pre-1990 so that you don’t have to do anything.
Although I do agree with you, that rating a teachers ability and engagement in teaching kids/students might be a good idea, I do think it is important to show the other side of the argument.
First I need to clear up, that the german teacher you are talking about was not a college teacher but a teacher for kids, most likely around puberty. In Germany, you do pay for university but you cannot compare it to US-standarts. So the parents of these kids, being taught by this teacher, pay for school by taxes and pay for textbooks and materials. Although I do not think that it should matter who pays for the education and that it should in any way affect the quality of education, it is not okay to say that you “want what you payed for”. In this case.
The other thing is, that I actually do think that even though rating and putting pressure on teachers to do a good job is a good thing, in this case there were several points that did concern me too:
You let kids rate a teacher anonymously (of course), you do not control who votes how many times and you do not ask for the motives of voting. It is actually possible that a single kid that failed a class (without it being the teachers fault) compromises a rating like this by rating really bad several times. This is the point where my concern about this topic is.
Rating in general is good. Quality Management and control is good. Putting pressure on people to do their job good is great.
But without supervision and control on the rating site, the results are inaccurate and it is very likely that pupils use a platform like this to release some sort of anger … leading to calumny.
P.S.: I do realise that you wrote that people should rate so these ratings get more accurate.
The problem in a school is, that a teacher has how many kids a year? The younger the kids, the smaller the circle of people who vote.
And I do not think that votes from kids between 11 and 15 get that much more reliable when you get more votes.
Though your point of view does indeed apply for college and university, when professors have a LOT more students and these students are older. I totally agree with you on that part. If you are in college/university: Use these platforms!